Daily Kos

Open Thread for Night Owls & Early Birds

Mon May 19, 2008 at 09:45:05 PM PDT

James Parks, a blogger for the AFL-CIO news blog, writes at Alternet:

Young workers are being squeezed by high costs and stagnant wages, and they want the government to do more to solve today's economic mess.

The Economic State of Young America by Demos presents a statistical study of the economic condition of young workers, and The Progressive Generation: How Young Adults Think About the Economy by the Center for American Progress (CAP) analyzes public polling of young workers. ...

The two reports paint a picture of young workers who are faced with a combination of declining incomes, growing debt, high costs of education, homeownership and health care. In fact, say the reports' authors, this generation of young workers could be the first not to surpass the living standards of their parents.

One key finding is that young workers understand the role of unions in building economic and political strength to make changes in public policies and the workplace. In the CAP study, young workers gave unions an average ranking of 60 on a 0-to-100 scale (with 0 indicating a negative view and 100 being a positive view), the second-highest level of support of any age group in the more than 40 years the question has been asked.

From both reports, Parks culls some statistics:

* No matter what their level of education, incomes have declined for most young workers. The only young workers whose income rose between 1975 and 2005 were women with a college degree. Their incomes rose 10 percent, while incomes in all other education groups fell or remained stagnant.

* Even though their wages are declining, young workers' debts are rising. The average college graduate has a nearly $20,000 debt; average credit card debt has increased 47 percent between 1989 and 2004 for 25- to 34-year-olds and 11 percent for 18- to 24-year olds.

* Although more than half of women with a child under age one are in the labor force (up from 31 percent in 1976), public policy supports for young families are still lacking. Only 39 percent of women received paid maternity leave. Child care is expensive. Full-time care for a toddler ranges from $3,794 to $10,920 annually, while full-time care for an infant rages from $4,388 to $14,647 annually. In every region of the country, child care for two children exceeds the median rent and is as high or higher than the median monthly mortgage payment.

* Not surprisingly, young workers are more likely to support universal health coverage than any age group in the 30 previous years the question has been asked, with 57 percent of 18- to 29-year-olds saying that health insurance should come from a government insurance plan.

From Harper's Index for June:

Percentage of Republicans and Democrats, respectively, who believe in Hell: 69, 52

Percentage of Independents who do: 45

The Overnight News Digest is posted and includes an article from Spiegel Online International: Negotiators Gather in Dublin to Ban Cluster Bombs.

  • ::
Poll

On average, do young Americans (18-29) face a better or worse economic future than did young Americans of earlier (living) generations when they were young?

0%85 votes
7%924 votes
2%321 votes
33%4267 votes
3%396 votes
24%3149 votes
3%418 votes
15%2000 votes
0%21 votes
0%36 votes
1%159 votes
6%879 votes

| 12655 votes | Vote | Results

Tags: Open Thread for Night Owls & Early Birds, Unions, young Americans, generational differences, economics (all tags) :: Previous Tag Versions

View Comments | 212 comments